THE BIG SALE IS ON! TELL ME MORE
Kyounghoon Lee is professor in the Department of Korean Language and Literature at Yonsei University. John M. Frankl is professor of Korean and comparative literature at Underwood International College, Yonsei University.
A Cultural History of Modern Korean Literature takes readers on a dazzling journey through Korean literature. The unconventional history that results will both fascinate and provoke further interest in the early modern cultural products of a nation whose contemporary culture has ignited curiosity across the world. This accessible study will find broad appeal among college students, scholars, and anyone interested in the history and culture of Korea and the Japanese empire. --Janet Poole, University of Toronto This study draws our attention to Korean literary texts--especially their easily overlooked minor details--to bring to the fore what colonialization meant to Koreans and how it affected everyday practices. This book provides fascinating entryways into Korean literature for students and scholars of East Asian and world literature, and it also rekindles scholarly conversations about how to renew our understanding of colonialism in East Asia. --Yoon Sun Yang, Boston University This study was a landmark book when it first came out in 2003, and since then it has remained a classic in Korean literature and cultural studies. Through a brilliant analysis of a vast number of texts of various genres and types, Lee offers a comprehensive and insightful look at the thoroughgoing changes that the imbrication of colonialism and modernity brought to Korea in the first half the twentieth century. This book is a major scholarly achievement and John M. Frankl indeed does justice to the Korean original in his flawless English translation. --Jin-Kyung Lee, University of California, San Diego This work reconsiders some of the most seminal texts in modern Korean literature through a cultural-historical lens and offers incisive analyses of how the logic of modernity constructed everyday life and material reality in colonial Korea. Notably, Lee steers clear of ideologically saturated patterns of reading that have dichotomized nationalist resistance and colonial collaboration as the master paradigm in Korean literary scholarship. Thus, Lee is able to open up new territory in postcolonial studies in Korea and enter into dialogue with studies of global modernity more broadly. --Youngju Ryu, University of Michigan
